Roborock Qrevo S Pro vs eufy Omni S2: Spec-Based Comparison

The eufy Omni S2 publishes a higher claimed suction (30,000 Pa vs 18,500 Pa), a camera-assisted navigation stack (RGB camera plus 3D TOF), and a roller mop with published downward pressure (1.5 kg at 120 RPM). The Roborock Qrevo S Pro counters with LiDAR-only navigation (no camera), a dual liftable spinning-mop system with a published high-temperature self-cleaning cycle (167 °F) and warm-air drying (113 °F), a published warranty (1-year limited), and a shorter dock. Both are self-emptying flagship robots with all-in-one stations, and neither manufacturer publishes runtime or noise figures in our data. Every value below comes from manufacturer claims captured in our research database and last verified 2026-08-18; values the manufacturers do not publish are marked unknown. If you are ready to compare live offers, check current pricing for the Roborock Qrevo S Pro on Amazon and the eufy Omni S2 on Amazon.

Key differences at a glance

Full specification comparison

Where the Roborock Qrevo S Pro is stronger (per verified specs)

• No camera on the robot: navigation is LiDAR plus structured light only — relevant if you prefer not to place a camera-equipped device in your home.
• Published hot-water-style mop care: high-temperature mop self-cleaning at 167 °F and warm-air drying at 113 °F are explicitly documented; eufy documents ozone sterilization but no wash or drying temperatures in our data.
• Published warranty: 1-year limited with an extended option; eufy's warranty terms are not published in our data.
• Shorter dock: 20.4 in tall vs 26.38 in for the Omni Station — easier to fit under counters or shelves.

Where the eufy Omni S2 is stronger (per verified specs)

• Higher claimed suction: 30,000 Pa vs 18,500 Pa. Both are manufacturer marketing claims, not measured performance.
• Camera-assisted obstacle avoidance: RGB camera with LED illumination plus 3D TOF, which manufacturers typically use for object recognition; Roborock documents structured-light avoidance without a camera.
• Roller mop with published pressure: HydroJet 2.0 at 120 RPM with 1.5 kg downward pressure — a different mop architecture from the Qrevo S Pro's dual spinning pads, with pressure quantified by the manufacturer.
• Larger published dust capacity: 2.5 L auto-collection bag capacity is documented; the Qrevo S Pro record lacks a published dustbin/bag figure.
• Smaller robot footprint: 12.79 x 13.66 x 3.78 in vs 13.8 x 13.9 x 3.8 in.

Specifications neither manufacturer publishes (in our verified data)

We could not verify the following from sufficiently reliable sources, so we mark them unknown rather than filling gaps: battery runtime and noise levels for both robots; Roborock Qrevo S Pro dustbin capacity and robot-only weight (the published 25.6 ±0.7 figure covers robot plus dock); eufy Omni S2 warranty terms and weight; mop-wash and drying temperatures for the eufy; smart-home platform support details (Alexa, Google Home, Apple Home, Matter) for both; and current prices. Prices change frequently and are shown only where a dated source exists on the product pages.

How to read this comparison

This page compares manufacturer-published specifications only. We do not perform hands-on cleaning tests, so we do not declare an overall winner. Where a specification matters to you — for example camera-free navigation, a published warranty, or a quantified mop pressure — prefer the model whose published claims meet your requirement, and treat unmatched suction figures as marketing claims rather than measured performance.

Sources and verification

All specifications above come from manufacturer product pages and specification sheets captured during our research pipeline and stored with per-field provenance in our database. Claims for both products were last verified on 2026-08-18. Values marked "not published in our data" were not found in the manufacturer documentation we reviewed; they may exist elsewhere. As an Amazon Associate, CompareSmartDevice earns from qualifying purchases.